grandet.
中文Explore Grandet
MenuExplore Grandet

API PRICES

gpt-5.3-codex-spark

Provider prices, cheapest first

Browse all models

gpt-5.3-codex-spark official price: not yet recorded. Cheapest relay: codexopenai.cloud "GPT-特惠渠道" 0.385 CNY_CREDIT per million total tokens (credit price, not cash, observed 2026-10-10). 146 sites have comparable prices; 146 sites list this model.Relay blended price uses 75% input and 25% output.

Official prices are the vendor's cash prices. Inference providers also list cash prices and can be compared directly. Relays list prices in site credit; what you actually pay depends on each site's top-up rate, so they cannot be compared with official prices directly.

Unit: CNY credits per 1M tokens. These are site-credit prices; actual cost depends on each site’s top-up rate.

Filtering by provider: codexopenai.cloud

Searching…

Browse all providers
Clear filters

Blended price = input × 75% + output × 25%, without cache.

sites have comparable prices146146 sites list this model; approximately 1 operators
Lowest input price0.14CNY credits / 1M
Median of each provider’s lowest price0.14CNY credits / 1M

Relays

Prices below are in site credit, not cash.

#ProviderPlan / conditionsInput ↑CNY credits / 1MOutput CNY credits / 1MCache readCNY credits / 1MBlendedCNY credits / 1MDetails
Recent price
01codexopenai.cloudAsk or discussCollected:
View 4 plans		GPT-特惠渠道
不保证稳定，抓紧蹬
0.141.120.0140.385Full prices and sources
02codexopenai.cloudAsk or discussCollected:
View 4 plans		GPT-Plus
价格低廉，随时波动，服务有时不稳，如果遇到无法对话，可切换Pro继续
0.15751.260.015750.433125Full prices and sources
03codexopenai.cloudAsk or discussCollected:
View 4 plans		GPT-Pro-特价
特价Pro，如遇到服务不稳定，可暂时切换正价Pro
1.058.40.1052.8875Full prices and sources
04codexopenai.cloudAsk or discussCollected:
View 4 plans		GPT-Pro-正价
正价购买:稳定可用，上游无并发限制
1.75140.1754.8125Full prices and sources
Special groups · 3 rows · not ranked

These plans are marked as test, internal, disabled, gated by top-up or membership, or have a near-zero ratio. They may not be purchasable or stable, so they are listed separately and left out of the ranking and statistics.

  • near-zero-ratio group: 2 rows
  • marked display-only or do-not-select: 1 rows
  • nikoapi.xyz · codex-混池 · gpt-5.3-codex-spark · Input 0.05 / Output 0.4 CNY credits / 1M
  • us.nikoapi.xyz · codex-混池 · gpt-5.3-codex-spark · Input 0.05 / Output 0.4 CNY credits / 1M
  • api.ciyuanapis.xyz · default · gpt-5.3-codex-spark · Input 1.25 / Output 10 CNY credits / 1M
View all 3 rows →
How this ranking works

All per-token prices: 96,427 prices from 839 sites (about 733 companies). 88,950 are ranked, from 826 sites (about 720 companies); 7,477 more are listed separately and not ranked. Prices collected up to 2026-10-10.

This model has 496 recorded prices; 294 can be compared directly (285 ranked, 9 listed separately). Not comparable yet: ratio looks unset 52, new price under review; showing the previous one 43, price not parsed yet 40, tiered by rules (see Tiered prices) 37, display unit not confirmed 28, billed per request or another unit 2

4 recent · 0 stale (older than 7 days, or not updated by this refresh) · 0 unverified timestamps. Minimum and median only count recent paid prices; older prices stay in the table. 0 zero-valued pairs are separately unverified, without proof of free eligibility. Timing does not verify payment, upstream identity or quality.

Prices are converted to site credits using each site’s published ratio. What you actually pay depends on its top-up rate. Input, output and cache prices in each row come from the same plan. Several sites run by the same company take one place in the ranking: its cheapest plan, with the other sites listed under it. We judge “same company” by identical prices, status pages or homepage code; this is not a legal finding. To see every site’s prices, choose “All plans” or filter by provider.

“Self-declared unofficial channel” means the plan name itself says “reverse-engineered” or similar. We have not verified their source or quality. Minimum and median only count regular plans.

Full methodology →

Switch model