API PRICES

gpt-5-thinking-all

Provider prices, cheapest first

Browse all models

Unit: USD credits per 1M tokens. These are site-credit prices; actual cost depends on each site’s top-up rate.

Searching…

Browse all providers

Blended price = input × 75% + output × 25%, without cache.

Providers with prices13from 22 sites; one company’s sites count once
Lowest input price1.125USD credits / 1M
Median of each provider’s lowest price1.375USD credits / 1M
#ProviderPlan / conditionsInput ↑USD credits / 1MOutput USD credits / 1MCache readUSD credits / 1MBlendedUSD credits / 1MDetails
Recent price
01cnapi.kksj.orgAsk or discussCollected:
View 2 plans
default
默认分组,AZ渠道加部分模型官方逆向渠道,优先AZ,保底逆向,自动调优(default)
1.1259—3.09375
02api.hopeai.ccAsk or discussCollected:
View 1 plans
default
默认分组
1.252.5—1.5625
0235.aigcbest.topAsk or discussCollected:
View 2 plans
default
⭐ 推荐 | 全模型自动负载优化最高可用性
1.2510—3.4375
02aigcbest.topAsk or discussCollected:
View 2 plans
1 more site of the same company

Basis: identical quotes, same status-page name, logo or server address. Counted as one company in the ranking; this is not a legal finding.

default
⭐ 推荐 | 全模型自动负载优化
1.2510—3.4375
02api.bianxie.aiAsk or discussCollected:
View 1 plans
default
default
1.2510—3.4375
02deepkey.topAsk or discussCollected:
View 3 plans
gpt-azure
gpt-azure
1.25100.1253.4375
07xrok.devAsk or discussCollected:
View 1 plans
AZ-GPT
AZ GPT支持高并发
1.37511—3.78125
08api.eido.topAsk or discussCollected:
View 1 plans
default
默认分组
1.612.8—4.4
09hohoapi.comAsk or discussCollected:
View 1 plans
default
通用渠道(全站大部分模型可用)
1.62513—4.46875
10poloai.topAsk or discussCollected:
View 6 plans
2 more sites of the same company

Basis: identical quotes, same status-page name, logo or server address. Counted as one company in the ranking; this is not a legal finding.

az
微软Azure号池资源
1.87515—5.15625
119527.codesAsk or discussCollected:
View 1 plans
4 more sites of the same company

Basis: identical homepage assets, identical quotes, same status-page name, logo or server address. Counted as one company in the ranking; this is not a legal finding.

Azure-GPT
Azure-GPT
3.7530—10.3125
12api.xhuoai.comAsk or discussCollected:
View 1 plans
企业渠道
OpenAI/Claude企业级渠道,追求极速稳定首选,超高并发,功能与官方完全一致,5.6折,倍率4.0
540—13.75
13gptapi.asiaAsk or discussCollected:
View 1 plans
2 more sites of the same company

Basis: identical homepage assets, identical quotes, same status-page name, logo or server address. Counted as one company in the ranking; this is not a legal finding.

enterprise
企业通道
8.8270.56—24.255
How this ranking works

All per-token prices: 96,427 prices from 839 sites (about 733 companies). 88,950 are ranked, from 826 sites (about 720 companies); 7,477 more are listed separately and not ranked. Prices collected up to 2026-10-10.

This model has 121 recorded prices; 44 can be compared directly. Not comparable yet: ratio looks unset 25, new price under review; showing the previous one 20, display unit not confirmed 18, billed per request or another unit 8, scope of the official doc price not confirmed 4, price not parsed yet 2

43 recent · 0 stale (older than 7 days, or not updated by this refresh) · 0 unverified timestamps. Minimum and median only count recent paid prices; older prices stay in the table. 0 zero-valued pairs are separately unverified, without proof of free eligibility. Timing does not verify payment, upstream identity or quality.

Prices are converted to site credits using each site’s published ratio. What you actually pay depends on its top-up rate. Input, output and cache prices in each row come from the same plan. Several sites run by the same company take one place in the ranking: its cheapest plan, with the other sites listed under it. We judge “same company” by identical prices, status pages or homepage code; this is not a legal finding. To see every site’s prices, choose “All plans” or filter by provider.

“Self-declared unofficial channel” means the plan name itself says “reverse-engineered” or similar. We have not verified their source or quality. Minimum and median only count regular plans.

Full methodology →