API PRICES

gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview

Tiered prices, cheapest first

Browse all models

Uses the standard tier (shortest context, base price). Full rules are in Details.

Search modelsModel528 matches; choose and submit to view prices.

Unit: USD credits per 1M tokens. These are site-credit prices; actual cost depends on each site’s top-up rate.

Find a provider by name or address

Searching…

Browse all providers

Providers with prices7from 9 sites; one company’s sites count once

Lowest input price0.17USD credits / 1M

Median of each provider’s lowest price0.5USD credits / 1M

#	Provider	Plan / conditions	Input ↑USD credits / 1M	Output USD credits / 1M	Cache readUSD credits / 1M	BlendedUSD credits / 1M	Details
Recent price
01	test-api.apiqik.onlineAsk or discussCollected: 10 Oct 2026, 07:30 UTC View 2 plans	vertex/sp/gemini Standard tier · base vertex/sp/gemini	0.17	1.02	—	0.3825	Full prices and sources
02	turbo-api.comAsk or discussCollected: 10 Oct 2026, 09:11 UTC View 1 plans	common_60 Standard tier · default 通用60%	0.3	1.8	—	0.675	Full prices and sources
03	openp.aiAsk or discussCollected: 10 Oct 2026, 07:28 UTC View 2 plans	default Standard tier · base 官方API	0.5	3	—	1.125	Full prices and sources
03	visnext.aiAsk or discussCollected: 10 Oct 2026, 07:31 UTC View 5 plans 1 more site of the same company api.visnext.ai Basis: identical quotes, same status-page name, logo or server address. Counted as one company in the ranking; this is not a legal finding.	default Standard tier · graduated 默认分组	0.5	3	—	1.125	Full prices and sources
05	clauddy.comAsk or discussCollected: 10 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC View 2 plans 1 more site of the same company api.clauddy.com Basis: identical homepage assets, identical quotes, same status-page name, logo or server address. Counted as one company in the ranking; this is not a legal finding.	Gemini Standard tier · base Gemini Ultra专用	0.9	5.4	0.09	2.025	Full prices and sources
06	niffler.orgAsk or discussCollected: 10 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC View 1 plans	Gemini Standard tier · standard Gemini官转	1.25	7.5	—	2.8125	Full prices and sources
07	amapi.aiAsk or discussCollected: 10 Oct 2026, 07:15 UTC View 1 plans	gemini-image-official Standard tier · base Gemini 官方API，极度稳定，适合企业用户	3.6	21.6	—	8.1	Full prices and sources

Special groups · 1 rows · not ranked

These plans are marked as test, internal, disabled, gated by top-up or membership, or have a near-zero ratio. They may not be purchasable or stable, so they are listed separately and left out of the ranking and statistics.

test or debug group: 1 rows

openp.ai · test · gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview · Input 1 / Output 6 USD credits / 1M

View all 1 rows →

How this ranking works

All tiered prices: 27,612 prices from 609 sites (about 531 companies). 26,040 are ranked, from 602 sites (about 524 companies); 1,572 more are listed separately and not ranked. Prices collected up to 2026-10-10.

This model has 36 tiered prices; 25 can be compared directly (24 ranked, 1 listed separately). Not comparable yet: rule billed per request · compared separately 9, display unit not confirmed 1, formula-based rule pricing 1

21 recent · 0 stale (older than 7 days, or not updated by this refresh) · 0 unverified timestamps. Minimum and median only count recent paid prices; older prices stay in the table. 0 zero values are separately unverified, without proof of free eligibility.

For tiered models (e.g. longer context costs more) we use the standard tier: shortest context, normal service tier, base price without promotions. Prices that change with time of day or request options are listed separately with the reason. See “Details” for the full rules.

Prices are converted to site credits using each site’s published ratio and display multiplier. What you actually pay depends on its top-up rate. Several sites run by the same company take one place in the ranking: its cheapest plan, with the other sites listed under it. We judge “same company” by identical prices, status pages or homepage code; this is not a legal finding. To see every site’s prices, choose “All plans” or filter by provider.

Full methodology →